Costs
Part of Rhetorical devices in famous historic speeches
Best rhetorical devices should be sorted by problem, not prestige
Best rhetorical devices lists rank tools without naming the job. A table of speaker problems and matching techniques, plus the four worth learning first.
Ranking rhetorical devices is like ranking tools. Ask what the speaker needed and the ranking dissolves into a set of matched pairs: this problem, that technique.
This page is about why the ranked lists mislead and what to learn instead. It reproduces no passages and names no speaker.
What to take away
- There is no best device. There are devices that solve the problem in front of the speaker and devices that do not.
- Three or four techniques, understood properly, will carry almost all practical work.
Ranked shortlist, in order:
- Repetition of an opening phrase.
- Balanced opposition.
- The concrete instance.
- Deliberate variation in sentence length.
What the ranked lists actually select for
- A name that sounds impressive.A device with a classical label gets listed; the same move without a label does not. The general survey of rhetoric covers a tradition of naming that was built for teaching, not for ranking.
- Visibility on the page.Devices you can see in a printed extract are listed. Devices that exist only in delivery, such as a held pause or a change of pace, are not.
- Ease of demonstration.A device that can be illustrated in one sentence outranks one that needs a whole passage.
- Availability of a famous example.Which is a fact about which speeches are free to quote, not about which techniques work.
Put together, the standard list is a list of short, nameable, page-visible techniques with a well-known illustration attached. That is a teaching artifact, and it should not be mistaken for a hierarchy.
Matching problems to techniques
| The speaker's problem | What actually helps | Which of the four does this |
|---|---|---|
| The audience cannot hear every word | Repeated openings, short clauses, strong stresses | Repetition of an opening phrase |
| The audience does not know where they are in the argument | Signposting, numbered movements, a returning phrase | Repetition of an opening phrase |
| The audience does not believe the speaker has standing | An admitted limit, a specific first-hand detail | The concrete instance |
| The point is abstract | One concrete instance, described plainly | The concrete instance |
| The room is hostile | Concession stated in the opponent's own terms before any argument | Balanced opposition |
| The passage must survive extraction | A short self-contained sentence at the end of a movement | Deliberate variation in sentence length |
| Attention is fading | A change of pace, a direct question, a shift in sentence length | Deliberate variation in sentence length |
Read as a table of problems, the field becomes usable. Read as a list of names,
Speaker Problems and Matching Techniques
Speaker's problem
- Audience cannot hear every word
- Repeated openings, short clauses, strong stresses
- Audience lost in the argument
- Signposting, numbered movements, returning phrase
- Audience doubts speaker's standing
- Admitted limit, specific first-hand detail
- The point is abstract
- One concrete instance, described plainly
- The room is hostile
- Concession in opponent's own terms first
- Passage must survive extraction
- Short self-contained sentence at movement's end
- Attention is fading
- Change of pace, direct question, sentence-length shift
What actually helps
- Audience cannot hear every word
- Audience lost in the argument
- Audience doubts speaker's standing
- The point is abstract
- The room is hostile
- Passage must survive extraction
- Attention is fading
The four worth learning first
- Repetition of an opening phrase.It carries structure to a listener who cannot look back, and it works in every setting. The description of anaphora covers the mechanics; the reason to learn it first is that it does the most work for the least skill. Lincoln's Gettysburg Address repeats 'we can not dedicate, we can not consecrate, we can not hallow this ground.'
- Balanced opposition.Two clauses set against each other. Useful, and easy to overuse to the point where every sentence sounds like a slogan. Lincoln's Gettysburg Address balances 'what we say here' against 'what they did here' in a single sentence.
- The concrete instance.One specific thing instead of a general claim. Technically not a figure at all, and worth more than most of them. Lincoln's Gettysburg Address makes the field itself the instance: 'a portion of that field, as a final resting place.'
- Deliberate variation in sentence length.The simplest control over pace available, and invisible in any list because it has no classical name. The Gettysburg Address moves from a long opening sentence to the short 'We are met on a great battle-field of that war.'
Two of those four are unnamed in the tradition, which is itself the argument against learning from a ranked list.
Where the lists cause harm
A writer who has learned devices as a checklist will insert them. That produces speeches in which the technique is visible and the reasoning is absent, which an audience registers as being handled rather than persuaded.
The corrective is to ask, for every device identified, what problem it solved and how you know the problem existed. That method is in speech analysis, and it requires the occasion evidence from political speeches.
Learning them properly
Take one speech you can lawfully hear in full. Listen without a list. Mark the five places where your attention changed, then go back and work out what the speaker did at each of those points. Some of it will have a name and some of it will not.
Repeat with a speech from a different setting, and the same technique will do a different job, a lesson no list can deliver.
Older material is the easiest to practice on, since it can be reproduced and marked up freely. public domain speeches explains how to establish that a given text is free to work with.
Common questions
Is there a device that always works?
Repetition of an opening phrase comes closest, because it solves a problem every listener has. It still fails when it is applied to a passage that has nothing to repeat about.
How many devices should a speech contain?
The wrong question. A speech contains as many as its problems require, and a speech with a single problem may sensibly use one technique throughout.
